Personal Economics (or How to Budget)
It seems that many people do not understand a very simple principle and it makes them VERY unhappy. It can screw up their life so please continue reading to help you be happy! (or too simplistic so skip!)
For an individual for a period of time:
Income
(I) minus Expenses (E) = Savings (S)
Because one has Income and Expenses for a specific time this relationship is period dependent. A month is a good baseline to consider as rent or housing costs are often monthly. Rent is only part of expenses. One must eat so food costs over the period must be considered.
If I -E = positive S one can use the S in another period, and it is part of I. If it persists positive your savings will grow. If it persists negatively your debt will grow.
What this means is that whatever income an individual has will constrain what he/she spends. Sure, one can spend way more than Income but debt will rise and those who hold your debt will want to get paid back. You can have your stuff taken away via seizure or if you borrowed from the Mob you can have your kneecaps broken.
What can you do?
Control I This usually takes time. Get a higher paying job (this may include training like education that is a cost for a period of time). Get a second job. Have savings from previous periods that pay interest, dividends, etc.
Control E This can usually be done more quickly. The Expenses one has are a) fixed (like rent, utilities, etc.) and b) discretionary (your choices substitute - like buy groceries and cooking at home instead of eating at a restaurant, making coffee at home versus at a café, buy lower priced stuff, etc.)
This concept is called BUDGETING. It is the matching of Income to Expenses. Even fixed Expenses can be lessened through substituting. Rent can be lessened by moving, taking in another person to help pay expenses (a roomie).
There is a reason this came after Patience, Basic Economics, Survival, and other posts. Most of these posts relate to each other. Please consider that.
As previously stated, Millionaires are people who live within their means, budget, and spend wisely, and focus on financial independence first. These are habits that take discipline, but ones we can all adopt to begin growing wealth or at least lessen debt.
Wealth is not
evil in itself, it is simply the accumulation of residual income over time .
A case study:
Ronald James Read (October 23, 1921 – June 2, 2014) was an American
philanthropist, investor, janitor, and gas station attendant. Read grew up
in Dummerston,
Vermont, in an impoverished farming household. He walked or hitchhiked
4 mi (6.4 km) daily to his high school and was the first high school
graduate in his family. He enlisted in the United
States Army during World War II, serving in Italy as a military policeman. Upon an honorable
discharge from the military in 1945, Read returned to Brattleboro, Vermont, where he worked as a gas station attendant and
mechanic for about 25 years. Read retired for one year and then took a
part-time janitor job at J. C. Penney where he worked for
17 years until 1997.
Read
died in 2014. He received media coverage in numerous newspapers and magazines
after bequeathing US$1.2 million to Brooks Memorial Library and $4.8 million to Brattleboro Memorial Hospital. Read amassed a fortune
of almost $8 million by investing in dividend-producing stocks,
avoiding the stocks of companies he did not understand such as technology
companies, living frugally, and being a buy and hold investor in a diversified portfolio of stocks with a heavy concentration in blue chip companies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Read_(philanthropist)
The point
of this blog is to help the reader think critically and rationally. That
suggests using the reader's intelligence to make them more aware of what is and
change the reader's behavior and hopefully have a more fulfilling life. Not wanting
too much too soon; having Patience is implicitly part of the formula.
This is strictly
my opinion, but it seems to me there are thresholds of economic well being
Survival: going
day to day ($0 or negative wealth)
Advanced Survival:
Going paycheck to paycheck (this can be moved to the next level with some
planning like reducing expenses, improving income). ($500 or negative
wealth)
Moderate wealth:
Having enough to cover unexpected expenses from Saving (this can more
easily be moved to the next level with some planning like reducing expenses,
improving income). (Enough to cover 3 months expenses with a stoppage of wage
income, Likely $30,000+)
Secure wealth:
Enough Savings and Income to offset expense for a lifetime. (Income is likely
to be from renewable (passive) sources like rents, dividends interest,
pensions... likely wealth exceeds $1,000,000).
Moderate wealth:
Beyond secure. Can purchase luxury goods in moderation. Some political/social
influence beyond voting through activism/donations. (Likely wealth exceeds
$5,000,000).
Great wealth:
Likely to have well more than what one could purchase in a lifetime. Individual
can buy luxury goods beyond normal like private aircraft, yachts, private islands,
can influence politics/social outcomes through activism/donations. (Likely
wealth exceeds $100,000,000).
Massive wealth: Almost unlimited possibilities. Could buy entire corporations,
has political/social influence at high levels. (Likely wealth exceeds $1,000,000,000).
The amounts are in US Dollars at 2022 values.
At each threshold one must ask is this enough? The temptation is to play
at a whole different level, if successful. If not successful, one could drop
one or more levels.
The means to how
this wealth was acquired is also important. Ronald James Read achieved moderate
wealth by his own actions. He knew how he got there and continued the pattern.
Those who inherit or win great wealth are less secure, with greater likelihood
of loss.
Life
after winning the lottery may not stay glamorous forever. Whether they win $500
million or $1 million, about 70 percent of lotto winners lose or spend all that
money in five years or less.
https://www.rd.com/list/13-things-lottery-winners/
What is achieved
with ease is held with difficulty. What is achieved with difficulty is held
with ease. (Machiavelli)
©
Please note that the blog is giving credit for the picture, which is a quick summary of the post, not recommending (or the reverse) the firm. There is no advertising on this blog.
