Modern Property Rights
Today, property rights are protected by national
laws and international agreements, ensuring individuals and businesses can
own, transfer, and profit from assets.
Property rights are a fundamental aspect
of legal and economic systems, shaping how individuals, businesses, and
governments interact with resources.
Key Perspectives:
- Legal
Foundation –
Property rights are protected by laws that define ownership and usage. In
the U.S., the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause ensures that private
property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation.
- Economic
Importance –
Property rights are essential for market efficiency. They allow owners to buy,
sell, rent, or transfer assets, ensuring stability in economic
transactions.
- Philosophical
Perspective –
Thinkers like John Locke argued that property is a natural right
derived from labor. The U.S. Founders embraced this idea, linking property
rights to personal liberty.
- Government
Regulation – While
property rights are protected, governments can impose regulations, such as
zoning laws or environmental restrictions, which sometimes lead to
disputes over compensation.
- Social
Impact – Property
ownership is often tied to wealth and social status. Debates arise over
whether property rights should be absolute or balanced with broader
societal needs.
Even with modern property (patent)
rights things can go awry. Nikola Tesla was a visionary, but his life ended in
financial ruin due to a combination of business missteps, lost patents, and
personal eccentricities.
- Financial
Struggles – Tesla
had the potential to become one of the richest men in history. His alternating
current (AC) patents were worth millions, but he tore up a
lucrative contract with Westinghouse, forfeiting royalties that could
have made him a billionaire.
- Failed
Projects – Tesla
invested heavily in ambitious ideas, such as wireless energy
transmission, but lacked funding to bring them to fruition. Investors,
including J.P. Morgan, eventually withdrew support.
- Rivalries
& Missed Opportunities
– Tesla lost the race to invent the radio to Guglielmo Marconi,
despite having earlier patents that could have secured his claim.
- Isolation & Decline – In his later years,
Tesla led a more reclusive life, residing in modest hotels and directing
considerable attention toward caring for pigeons. He died alone in the Hotel New Yorker
in 1943, suffering from coronary thrombosis.
Despite his tragic end, Tesla’s legacy
remains immense, influencing modern electricity, wireless technology,
and even space exploration. His story is a reminder that brilliance alone
isn’t enough—financial strategy and business acumen also matter.
Rule of Law
Establishment of dispute resolution
process. Laws must be transparent, fair and enforceable. They are the
cornerstone of a stable and innovative society. People will respond positively
to a fair and just system. A necessary condition is that government, politics,
courts and societal norms must conform.
However, justice and especially fairness
are subjective. Equitable access to property, education and opportunity are a
good starting point. In reality there will always be better and lesser
advantaged groups.
So, does establishing property rights
make everything perfect? Far from it as we discussed in Value and Worth,
Billionaires, Wealth Distribution, Conquest, Conflict, Basic Economics, there
remain plenty of problems. Internationally property rights can more easily be
compromised as the non-domestic government doesn’t really have a stake in
supporting property rights that benefit another country. Recall from Basic
Economics, one can create value or steal it.
Perpetual or long duration patents
can cause problems, keeping medicine prices high even after initial research
and development costs have been recovered. A good example is
The EpiPen, a life-saving device for
treating severe allergic reactions, has a fascinating origin and a
controversial financial history. (the following is mostly AI generated)
🧪 Development History
- Inventor: Sheldon Kaplan developed the
original auto-injector in the 1970s for the U.S. military to deliver
antidotes for chemical warfare.
- Civilian
Adaptation: Kaplan
later adapted the device for medical use, leading to the creation of the
EpiPen. It was FDA-approved for epinephrine delivery in 1987.
- Earlier
Alternatives:
Before the EpiPen, treatments like the Ana-Kit required manual injection,
which was slower and more error-prone.
💰 Research and Commercial Costs
- Development
Costs: The
combined costs of research, development, advertising, and lobbying for the
EpiPen totaled around $1 billion.
- Inventor
Compensation:
Sheldon Kaplan reportedly never received royalties for his invention.
- Marketing
and Lobbying:
Mylan, which acquired rights to EpiPen in 2007, spent heavily on marketing
and lobbying to expand its use—especially in schools. used patent
extensions and device tweaks to maintain market dominance even
after the original drug patent expired.
- These
changes allowed them to delay generic competition, despite epinephrine
itself being off-patent.
- 2.
Drug-Device Combination Loophole
- The
EpiPen is a combination product (drug + device), which falls into a
regulatory gray area.
- The
FDA treats these differently, allowing companies to maintain exclusivity
longer by modifying the injector rather than the drug.
- 3.
Regulatory Gaps and Lobbying
- Mylan
lobbied heavily to make EpiPens mandatory in schools, boosting demand
while limiting competition.
- Weak
enforcement and slow regulatory response enabled price hikes—from ~$100 to
over $600 for a two-pack.
What in this looks fair?
In summary, property rights
are essential; however, their development remains an ongoing and sometimes
challenging process. The very point of this blog is to help one
structure arguments with pros and cons and come to one’s own conclusion.
AI generated
©
